Subscribe To Our Newsletter
Abonnez-vous à notre bulletin
COMPARATIVE CCM SUCCESS RATES WITH GLOBAL FUND PROPOSALS
GFO Issue 81

COMPARATIVE CCM SUCCESS RATES WITH GLOBAL FUND PROPOSALS

Author:

Bernard Rivers

Article Type:
Analysis

Article Number: 1

ABSTRACT This analysis shows, for each CCM, what proposals it has submitted to the Global Fund since the Fund started, and which of these have been approved. This enables, in turn, a comparison to be made between CCMs regarding their relative success in getting their Global Fund proposals approved.

The Global Fund’s eighth Round of proposals, to be launched on 1 March 2008, will be particularly well funded; there should be enough money to approve every proposal in which the need is clearly established, the design is good, and the ability to implement is proven. Therefore, CCMs that in the past have had low success rates with some of their Global Fund proposals, or that have tended to “aim low” despite there being a high need, might want to consider submitting a bold proposal in Round 8.

The Global Fund provides, through its website, large amounts of information about proposals that the Fund has approved. But it provides no information about proposals that the Fund has NOT approved. That unfortunately means that the interested visitor to the site cannot find out how often his or her own County Coordinating Mechanism (CCM) has applied for a grant, or how its success rate has compared with that of other CCMs.

The table below seeks to fill that gap. It shows, for each country, and for each of the three diseases, and for each of the seven Rounds since the Fund started, whether the CCM from that country submitted a proposal that was approved (shown as “Appr”), or submitted one that was not approved (“Rej”), or did not submit a proposal at all (blank).

In addition, the table shows the total number of proposals approved and not approved for each CCM, and for each CCM plus disease.

CCMs considering submitting a Round 8 proposal should not delay their planning until the Call for Proposals is issued and the final proposal form and guidelines documents become available on March 1. Instead, if they wish to maximize their chances of success, they should start their planning process now. That planning could include reviewing the table below and deciding which successful proposals by other countries to examine at the Fund’s website (www.theglobalfund.org); reviewing the evaluation of the effectiveness of each Global Fund grant that is provided by Aidspan (publisher of GFO) at www.aidspan.org/grants; and reviewing “The Aidspan Guide to Round 7 Applications to the Global Fund”, available in English, French and Spanish at www.aidspan.org/guides.

Highlights identified in the analysis include:

  • Most successes: The CCMs with the largest numbers of approved proposals were Cambodia and China (11 each), India and Lao PDR (10 each), Rwanda (9), and Uganda (8 each).
  • Highest success rates: Of CCMs that have submitted 8 or more proposals, the ones that succeeded with two-thirds or more of them were Lao PDR (91% success rate), Malawi (70%), China (69%), and Tajikistan (67%). (Lao PDR has submitted eleven proposals, of which every single one was successful except for a TB proposal in Round 1.)
  • Having a hard time: The CCMs with the largest number of rejected proposals were Pakistan (16), Kenya and Nigeria (15 each), Sudan (13), and Benin, Burkina Faso, and DR Congo (11 each). And of CCMs that have submitted 8 or more proposals, the ones that succeeded with one-quarter or less were Congo Rep. (13% success rate), Comoros and Ecuador (22% each) and Guatemala (23%).
  • Having an even harder time: CCMs that have had multiple rejections without yet having an approval for a particular disease, and that are perhaps in need of more or better technical assistance, are Azerbaijan (3 malaria rejections), Cape Verde (3 HIV/AIDS rejections), Congo Rep. (3 malaria rejections), Dominican Republic (5 malaria rejections), and Ecuador (4 malaria rejections).
  • Persisting until success: The best examples of CCMs persisting until they succeeded were Chad (which had a malaria proposal approved in Round 7 after having its malaria proposals rejected in five previous Rounds), and Senegal (which had a TB proposal approved in Round 7 after having its TB proposals rejected in five previous Rounds). And CCMs that have had a proposal approved after four previous proposals were rejected for the disease in question were Afghanistan (HIV/AIDS), Bangladesh (Malaria), Bulgaria (TB), Côte d’Ivoire (Malaria), Eritrea (TB), Guatemala (TB), Iran (Malaria), Kenya (HIV/AIDS), Maldives (HIV/AIDS), Paraguay (HIV/AIDS), Sri Lanka (HIV/AIDS), and Zimbabwe (TB).
  • Best HIV/AIDS examples: CCMs that have had the most successes with HIV/AIDS proposals (and whose proposals might therefore be worth studying at the Fund’s website) are Cambodia (5 approved out of 7), China (4 approved out of the last 5), Lao PDR (all 3 approved) and Peru (all 3 approved).
  • Best TB examples: CCMs that have had the most successes with TB proposals are China (all 4 proposals approved), DR Congo (the last 3 proposals all approved), India (4 approved out of 5) and Lao PDR (the last 3 proposals all approved).
  • Best malaria examples: CCMs that have had the most successes with malaria proposals are Lao PDR (all 4 proposals approved) and Togo (the last 3 proposals all approved).
  • Success rates by disease: Proposals for the three diseases have had broadly similar success rates when considered over all Rounds together – HIV/AIDS proposals had a 43% success rate (192 proposals approved out of 445 submitted); malaria 41% (135 out of 326); and TB 46% (146 out of 316). Within each Round, however, success rates by disease had rather varying success rates.
Number of CCM proposals approved (Appr), approval rate (%), and number not approved (Rej)
Proposals from each CCM Proposals from each CCM regarding each disease Round
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

 

Afghanistan
Appr=4 (29%) Rej=10
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (20%) Rej=4 Rej Rej Rej Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Rej Rej
Other: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Appr Rej

 

Albania
Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr

 

Algeria
Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr

 

Angola
Appr=4 (50%) Rej=4
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Appr Rej

 

Argentina
Appr=1(100%) Rej=0
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr  NA
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Armenia
Appr=2 (33%) Rej=4
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2 Rej Rej
TB: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Appr Rej

 

Azerbaijan
Appr=3 (43%) Rej=4
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Rej
TB: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr

 

Bangladesh
Appr=5 (33%) Rej=10
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (33%) Rej=4 Appr Rej Rej Rej Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=1 (17%) Rej=5 Rej Rej Rej Rej Appr Rej
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr

 

Barbados
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1
HIV/AIDS: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej NA
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Belarus
Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr

 

Belize
Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr NA
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej NA
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Benin
Appr=7 (39%) Rej=11
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Rej Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=3 (50%) Rej=3 Appr Appr Rej Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Rej Rej Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2 Rej Rej

 

Bhutan
Appr=5 (50%) Rej=5
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr

 

Bolivia
Appr=3 (33%) Rej=6
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Appr Rej
TB: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Bosnia and Herzegovina
Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr

 

Botswana
Appr=2 (29%) Rej=5
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Appr Rej
TB: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Appr Rej
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Brazil
Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1
TB: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr

 

Bulgaria
Appr=2 (29%) Rej=5
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (20%) Rej=4 Rej Rej Rej Rej Appr

 

Burkina Faso
Appr=5 (31%) Rej=11
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Rej Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (33%) Rej=4 Rej Appr Rej Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Rej Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Burundi
Appr=5 (45%) Rej=6
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Rej
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Cambodia
Appr=11 (55%) Rej=9
HIV/AIDS: Appr=5 (71%) Rej=2 Appr Appr Rej Appr Appr Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=3 (50%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Rej Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2 (33%) Rej=4 Rej Appr Rej Appr Rej Rej
Other: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr

 

Cameroon
Appr=6 (40%) Rej=9
HIV/AIDS: Appr=3 (50%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Appr Appr Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Appr Rej Rej
TB: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Rej Rej

 

Cape Verde
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Rej

 

Central African Republic
Appr=5 (38%) Rej=8
HIV/AIDS: Appr=3 (60%) Rej=2 Appr Appr Rej Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=1 (20%) Rej=4 Rej Rej Appr Rej Rej
TB: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr

 

Chad
Appr=3 (25%) Rej=9
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=1 (17%) Rej=5 Rej Rej Rej+ Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr
+ Was at first provisionally approved, but was then rejected because TRP requirements were not met.

 

Chile
Appr=1(100%) Rej=0
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr NA
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

China
Appr=11 (69%) Rej=5
HIV/AIDS: Appr=4 (57%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Appr Appr Appr Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=3 (60%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Appr Appr Rej
TB: Appr=4(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr Appr Appr

 

Colombia
Appr=1 (14%) Rej=6
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (20%) Rej=4 Rej Appr Rej Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej
TB: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Comoros
Appr=2 (22%) Rej=7
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (20%) Rej=4 Rej Rej Appr Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Appr Rej Rej Rej

 

Congo (Democratic Republic)
Appr=6 (35%) Rej=11
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (33%) Rej=4 Rej Rej Appr Rej Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=1 (17%) Rej=5 Rej Rej Appr Rej Rej Rej
TB: Appr=3 (75%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Congo, Rep.
Appr=1 (13%) Rej=7
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Rej
TB: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2 Rej Rej

 

Costa Rica
Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr NA
Malaria: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej NA
TB: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej NA
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Côte d’Ivoire
Appr=4 (31%) Rej=9
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (20%) Rej=4 Appr Rej Rej Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=1 (20%) Rej=4 Rej Rej Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr

 

Croatia
Appr=1(100%) Rej=0
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr NA
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Cuba
Appr=3 (60%) Rej=2
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr
TB: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr

 

Djibouti
Appr=4 (36%) Rej=7
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr
Malaria: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Rej Appr

 

Dominica
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=0
No CCM proposals submitted

 

Dominican Republic
Appr=3 (27%) Rej=8
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=5 Rej Rej Rej Rej Rej
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Ecuador
Appr=2 (22%) Rej=7
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=4 Rej Rej Rej Rej
TB: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr

 

Egypt
Appr=3 (43%) Rej=4
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr*
Malaria: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr
* Proposal was originally rejected, but was then approved on appeal

 

El Salvador
Appr=3 (43%) Rej=4
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej
TB: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Rej

 

Equatorial Guinea
Appr=2 (29%) Rej=5
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr*
TB: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2 Rej Rej NA
* Proposal was originally rejected, but was then approved on appeal
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Eritrea
Appr=5 (33%) Rej=10
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Appr Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Rej Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (20%) Rej=4 Rej Rej Rej Rej Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Estonia
Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr NA
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Ethiopia
Appr=7 (41%) Rej=10
HIV/AIDS: Appr=3 (50%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Appr Rej Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (33%) Rej=4 Rej Appr Rej Appr Rej Rej
TB: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Rej Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Fiji
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1
HIV/AIDS: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Gabon
Appr=3 (43%) Rej=4
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr NA
Malaria: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Rej Appr Appr Rej
TB: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej NA
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Gambia, The
Appr=4 (36%) Rej=7
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Rej Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr

 

Georgia
Appr=6 (55%) Rej=5
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Ghana
Appr=6 (43%) Rej=8
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Rej Appr Rej
TB: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Rej Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Grenada
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=0
No CCM proposals submitted

 

Guatemala
Appr=3 (23%) Rej=10
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (20%) Rej=4 Rej Rej Rej Rej Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Guinea
Appr=5 (50%) Rej=5
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Rej Appr

 

Guinea-Bissau
Appr=5 (50%) Rej=5
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Rej Appr Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr
TB: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Rej

 

Guyana
Appr=4 (57%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr
TB: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Haiti
Appr=5 (56%) Rej=4
HIV/AIDS: Appr=3 (60%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Appr Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr

 

Honduras
Appr=3 (50%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Appr Rej
TB: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Appr Rej

 

India
Appr=10 (50%) Rej=10
HIV/AIDS: Appr=4 (57%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Rej Appr Rej Appr Appr
Malaria: Appr=1 (17%) Rej=5 Rej Rej Rej Appr Rej Rej
TB: Appr=4 (80%) Rej=1 Appr Appr Appr Rej Appr
Other: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr

 

Indonesia
Appr=6 (40%) Rej=9
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (29%) Rej=5 Appr Rej Rej Appr Rej Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3 Appr Rej Rej Appr Rej
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr

 

Iran
Appr=3 (30%) Rej=7
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Appr Rej+ Rej
Malaria: Appr=1 (20%) Rej=4 Rej Rej Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr
+ Was at first provisionally approved, but was then rejected because TRP requirements were not met.

 

Iraq
Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2
HIV/AIDS: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej
Malaria: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej
TB: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr

 

Jamaica
Appr=2(100%) Rej=0
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr

 

Jordan
Appr=3 (60%) Rej=2
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr

 

Kazakhstan
Appr=3 (38%) Rej=5
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Rej Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Kenya
Appr=7 (32%) Rej=15
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (29%) Rej=5 Rej Appr Rej Rej Rej Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (33%) Rej=4 Rej Appr Appr Rej Rej Rej
TB: Appr=3 (50%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Rej+ Rej Appr Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Rej
+ Was at first provisionally approved, but was then rejected because TRP requirements were not met.

 

Kiribati
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=0
No CCM proposals submitted

 

Korea (North)
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=3
Malaria: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2 Rej Rej+
TB: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej+
+ Was at first provisionally approved, but was then rejected because TRP requirements were not met.

 

Kosovo
Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr

 

Kyrgyzstan
Appr=5 (63%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr
Malaria: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr

 

Lao PDR
Appr=10 (91%) Rej=1
HIV/AIDS: Appr=3(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr Appr
Malaria: Appr=4(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr Appr Appr
TB: Appr=3 (75%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr Appr

 

Lesotho
Appr=5 (63%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=3 (60%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Liberia
Appr=6 (46%) Rej=7
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Rej Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Macedonia
Appr=3 (50%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr

 

Madagascar
Appr=5 (33%) Rej=10
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (20%) Rej=4 Appr Rej Rej Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=3 (60%) Rej=2 Appr Appr Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Rej Rej
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Malawi
Appr=7 (70%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=3 (75%) Rej=1 Appr Appr Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Rej Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr
Other: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr

 

Malaysia
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2
HIV/AIDS: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej NA
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej NA
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Maldives
Appr=1 (20%) Rej=4
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (20%) Rej=4 Rej Rej Rej Rej Appr

 

Mali
Appr=5 (45%) Rej=6
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Marshall Islands
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=0
No CCM proposals submitted

 

Mauritania
Appr=5 (63%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr
TB: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr

 

Mauritius
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1
HIV/AIDS: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej NA
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Mexico
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1
HIV/AIDS: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej NA
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Micronesia
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=0
No CCM proposals submitted

 

Moldova
Appr=3(100%) Rej=0
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr
TB: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr
Other: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr

 

Mongolia
Appr=5 (63%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=3 (50%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Rej Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr

 

Montenegro
Appr=2(100%) Rej=0
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr
TB: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr

 

Morocco
Appr=3 (75%) Rej=1
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr
TB: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr

 

Mozambique
Appr=6 (60%) Rej=4
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2 Rej Rej

 

Myanmar
Appr=3 (33%) Rej=6
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr

 

Namibia
Appr=5 (45%) Rej=6
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Rej Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr

 

Nepal
Appr=6 (40%) Rej=9
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (33%) Rej=4 Rej Appr Rej Rej Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3 Appr Rej Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Rej Appr
 
Nicaragua
Appr=4 (67%) Rej=2
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr
TB: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Appr Rej

 

Niger
Appr=6 (50%) Rej=6
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=3 (75%) Rej=1 Appr Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Appr Rej
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Nigeria
Appr=5 (25%) Rej=15
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (29%) Rej=5 Appr Rej Rej Rej Appr Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=2 (33%) Rej=4 Rej Appr Appr Rej Rej Rej
TB: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=4 Rej Rej+ Rej Appr Rej
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2 Rej Rej
+ Was at first provisionally approved, but was then rejected because TRP requirements were not met.

 

Pakistan
Appr=7 (30%) Rej=16
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (14%) Rej=6 Rej Appr Rej Rej Rej Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=3 (43%) Rej=4 Rej Appr Appr Rej Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=3 (43%) Rej=4 Rej Appr Appr Rej Rej Appr* Rej
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2 Rej Rej
* Proposal was originally rejected, but was then approved on appeal

 

Panama
Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2 Rej Rej NA
Malaria: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej NA
TB: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr NA
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Papua New Guinea
Appr=3 (43%) Rej=4
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr

 

Paraguay
Appr=3 (33%) Rej=6
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (20%) Rej=4 Rej Rej Rej Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr

 

Peru
Appr=5 (63%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=3(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr Appr
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Appr Rej
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2 Rej Rej

 

Philippines
Appr=8 (57%) Rej=6
HIV/AIDS: Appr=3 (60%) Rej=2 Rej Appr Rej Appr Appr
Malaria: Appr=3 (60%) Rej=2 Rej Appr Rej Appr Appr
TB: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Rej Appr Rej Appr*
* Proposal was originally rejected, but was then approved on appeal

 

Poland
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2
HIV/AIDS: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2 Rej Rej NA
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Romania
Appr=4(100%) Rej=0
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr NA
TB: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr NA
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Russian Federation
Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr NA
TB: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr*
* Proposal was originally rejected, but was then approved on appeal
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Rwanda
Appr=9 (53%) Rej=8
HIV/AIDS: Appr=3 (50%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Rej Rej Appr Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Appr Appr Rej
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr
Other: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr

 

Saint Lucia
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=0
No CCM proposals submitted

 

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=0
No CCM proposals submitted

 

Samoa
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=0
No CCM proposals submitted

 

Sao Tome & Principe
Appr=3 (33%) Rej=6
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr Appr
TB: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2 Rej Rej

 

Senegal
Appr=6 (46%) Rej=7
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr
Malaria: Appr=3 (75%) Rej=1 Appr Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (17%) Rej=5 Rej Rej Rej Rej Rej Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Serbia
Appr=3 (60%) Rej=2
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr

 

Seychelles
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1
HIV/AIDS: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej NA
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Sierra Leone
Appr=6 (50%) Rej=6
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr

 

Solomon Islands
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2
HIV/AIDS: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej
TB: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Somalia
Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1
Malaria: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr
TB: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr

 

South Africa
Appr=4 (31%) Rej=9
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (33%) Rej=4 Rej Appr Rej Rej Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2 Rej Rej NA
TB: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej
Other: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Appr Appr Rej Rej
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Sri Lanka
Appr=5 (33%) Rej=10
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (17%) Rej=5 Rej Rej Rej Rej Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3 Appr Appr Rej Rej Rej
TB: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Appr Rej

 

Sudan
Appr=6 (35%) Rej=11
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (33%) Rej=4 Rej Appr Rej Appr* Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2 (33%) Rej=4 Appr Rej Rej Appr* Rej Rej
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej
* Proposal was originally rejected, but was then approved on appeal

 

Suriname
Appr=4 (40%) Rej=6
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (33%) Rej=4 Rej Appr* Rej Appr Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr Appr
* Proposal was originally rejected, but was then approved on appeal

 

Swaziland
Appr=5 (42%) Rej=7
HIV/AIDS: Appr=3 (60%) Rej=2 Rej Appr Appr Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Appr Rej
TB: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Appr Rej

 

Syrian Arab Republic
Appr=1(100%) Rej=0
TB: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr

 

Tajikistan
Appr=6 (67%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=3 (75%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr Appr
Malaria: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr

 

Tanzania
Appr=7 (50%) Rej=7
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (33%) Rej=4 Appr Rej Appr Rej Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=3 (75%) Rej=1 Appr Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr
Other: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Appr Rej

 

Tanzania/Zanzibar
Appr=5 (71%) Rej=2
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Appr Rej
TB: Appr=1(100%) Rej=0 Appr

 

Thailand
Appr=6 (46%) Rej=7
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (33%) Rej=4 Appr Appr Rej Rej Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Rej Appr Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Appr Rej

 

Timor-Leste
Appr=5 (63%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Togo
Appr=7 (64%) Rej=4
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Appr Appr Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=3 (75%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr Appr
TB: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Tonga
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=0
No CCM proposals submitted

 

Tunisia
Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr

 

Turkey
Appr=1 (14%) Rej=6
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr NA
Malaria: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2 Rej Rej NA
TB: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=3 Rej Rej Rej NA
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Turkmenistan
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=3
HIV/AIDS: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej
Malaria: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej
TB: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Uganda
Appr=8 (47%) Rej=9
HIV/AIDS: Appr=3 (60%) Rej=2 Appr Appr Rej Rej Appr
Malaria: Appr=3 (50%) Rej=3 Rej Appr Appr Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Rej Appr Appr Rej
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2 Rej Rej

 

Ukraine
Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2(100%) Rej=0 Appr Appr
TB: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2 Rej Rej

 

Uruguay
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=2
HIV/AIDS: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej NA
TB: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej NA
Note: Country was not eligible to apply in all Rounds because of having a relatively high income level.

 

Uzbekistan
Appr=3 (38%) Rej=5
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Appr Rej
TB: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Appr* Rej
* Proposal was originally rejected, but was then approved on appeal

 

Vanuatu
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=0
No CCM proposals submitted

 

Vietnam
Appr=6 (55%) Rej=5
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3 Appr Rej Rej Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Rej Appr Appr
TB: Appr=2 (67%) Rej=1 Appr Rej Appr

 

West Bank and Gaza
Appr=0 (0%) Rej=0
No CCM proposals submitted

 

Yemen
Appr=4 (44%) Rej=5
HIV/AIDS: Appr=1 (50%) Rej=1 Rej Appr*
Malaria: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (33%) Rej=2 Rej Rej Appr
* Proposal was originally rejected, but was then approved on appeal

 

Zambia
Appr=6 (43%) Rej=8
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Appr Appr Rej Rej
Malaria: Appr=3 (60%) Rej=2 Appr Appr Rej Rej Appr
TB: Appr=1 (25%) Rej=3 Appr Rej Rej Rej
Other: Appr=0 (0%) Rej=1 Rej

 

Zimbabwe
Appr=5 (33%) Rej=10
HIV/AIDS: Appr=2 (40%) Rej=3 Appr Rej Rej Appr Rej
Malaria: Appr=2 (50%) Rej=2 Appr Rej Appr Rej
TB: Appr=1 (17%) Rej=5 Rej Rej Rej Rej Appr Rej

 

Notes:

  1. A blank cell means that the CCM did not apply for the disease in question in the Round in question.
  1. The term “not approved” is more appropriate than the term “rejected”, because in most such cases, the Fund encourages applicants to work hard to fix shortcomings and then to submit an improved proposal. But for linguistic simplicity, the term “rejected” has often been used in the analysis above.
  1. When a CCM submits a proposal with (say) three “components” (one for each of the three diseases), this is counted above, and by the Fund, as three proposals. On the other hand, if one of these components ends up having more than one Principal Recipient (PR), the Fund will establish one grant per PR; but above, this will still count as just one proposal.
  1. Some “upper middle income” countries were eligible to apply to the Fund in the earlier Rounds, but became ineligible in the later Rounds. Some of them may become eligible again in Round 8, because the eligibility rules were changed at the recent board meeting. For such countries, “NA” shown in the table above means that in Round 7, the country in question was not eligible to apply for a Global Fund grant for the disease in question. Eligibility regarding earlier rounds is not shown. Being ineligible in Round 7 does not necessarily mean that the country will be ineligible in Round 8.
  1. The table only deals with eligible applications received from CCMs. It does not show “non-CCM” applications (i.e. applications from NGOs etc.), or applications from Sub-CCMs, Regional CCMs, or Regional Organizations. It also does not show applications that were submitted by CCMs which the Secretariat “screened out” because the applications, or the applicants, were in some way ineligible.
  1. Components shown as “Other” refer to “HIV/TB” and “Integrated” applications from Rounds 1 to 4, and to “Health Systems Strengthening” applications from Round 5.
  1. A small number of applications shown as “Approved” were originally rejected, but were subsequently approved on appeal. And a small number of applications shown as “Rejected” were originally provisionally approved, but were subsequently rejected because various TRP requirements were not met with prior to the planned grant signature (namely: Chad, Round 3, malaria; Iran, Round 3, HIV/AIDS; Kenya, Round 3, TB; North Korea, Round 1, TB, and Round 3, malaria; and Nigeria, Round 2, TB).

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

AIDSPAN