Global Fund Observer
Global Fund Observer is the leading independent voice providing insight, analysis and opinion about the Global Fund. For authoritative and credible explanations about the policies, practices and procedures at the Secretariat, to insider information about Global Fund Board meetings, to real stories capturing the impact and role of the Global Fund at the country level, subscribe to our free twice-monthly newsletter.
To avoid the risk of your email system treating incoming issues of Global Fund Observer as spam, you should add firstname.lastname@example.org to your list of approved email senders. If you are not sure how to do this, speak to your system administrator or technical support person.
Latest GFO Live articles
GFO Current Issue
It is unusual for policies that are still under discussion by committees and the Board to be discussed in public at the instigation of one or more Board delegations. In a blog posted on 28 March, Meg Davis, a consultant to the Developing Country NGO Delegation, the Developed Country NGO Delegation and the Communities Delegation, discusses proposed changes to the Eligibility Policy. Aidspan labeled these discussions “appropriate and useful.” In this article, we provide a summary of the contents of the blog.
For weeks, the Global Fund has been criticized for entering into a partnership with Heineken because of concerns about the effects of alcohol on health. Now, the Global Fund has suspended the partnership – but, it says, for reasons that are unrelated to the criticism: The Fund said it was concerned about Heineken’s use of female beer promoters in ways that expose them to sexual exploitation and health risks. Executive Director Peter Sands announced the decision in a message to the Board and in a statement on the Fund’s website.
Chief of Staff Marijke Wijnroks is leading a review of internal Global Fund policies on sexual harassment in light of recent developments in other global health organizations (and beyond). The Global Fund has an Employee Handbook and a Code of Conduct for Employees that are designed to prevent and address instances of bullying and harassment, including sexual harassment. Since 2011, the Global Fund has investigated three cases of alleged sexual harassment.
Only a select group of the world’s top global health organizations have placed gender equality at the center of their operations, both programmatically and institutionally, according to a study carried out by Global Health 50/50. The Global Fund ranked among the top nine of the 140 organizations studied.
Many of our readers tell us that they find the Global Fund’s Co-Financing Policy confusing. So, in this article we provide a detailed explanation. The Co-Financing Policy is contained in the Sustainability, Transition and Co-Financing Policy, adopted in April 2016. It replaced the Global Fund’s policies on willingness to pay and counterpart financing.
Iraq’s TB component was in the process of transitioning away from Global Fund support when the ISIS emergency hit. Now the plan is to have Iraq join the Global Fund’s Middle East Response initiative when it enters its second phase in 2019. In December 2017, the Global Fund Board approved an extension for Iraq’s existing TB grant through the end of 2018.
President Donald Trump had sought a $224 million cut to the U.S. contribution to the Global Fund, but the FY 2018 budget adopted by Congress left the contribution intact at $1.35 billion. This is the first contribution by the U.S. towards its pledge of $4.3 billion for the replenishment period 2017–2019. The budgets for other global health programs generally remained unchanged from FY 2017, despite the president’s proposed cuts.
The Global Fund Board has approved another $102.9 million in funding for six grants emanating from four funding requests submitted by four countries. Interventions worth $40.3 million were added to the Unfunded Quality Demand Register. Nepal led the way with three grants approved worth $43.6 million. The cumulative amount awarded to date from the 2017–2019 allocations is just under $9 billion.
Eastern Europe and Central Asia is one of two regions where planning for the transition away from Global Fund support is most advanced. (The other region is Latin America and the Caribbean.) This article provides an overview of the transition status of HIV, TB and malaria components in EECA countries.
The new TB guidelines from the World Health Organization will expand access to testing and care for people with latent TB infection. The precise implications for the Global Fund are not yet known.
When it reviewed Pakistan’s recent TB funding request, the Technical Review Panel requested more information on how the needs of key populations such as refugees and people in congregate settings would be addressed. This issue was cleared during grant-making. This article provides a summary of the comments of the TRP and the Grant Approvals Committee on the funding request.
In this “OF INTEREST” roundup, we highlight four articles ranging from TB as a growing public health threat to mentoring in the era of #MeToo.