Subscribe to Our Newsletter!
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the latest updates directly to your inbox.
This week the three Global Fund governing Committees - Audit & Finance, Ethics & Governance and Strategy - are meeting to discuss issues for decision and further discussion at November’s upcoming Board meeting. This article provides a brief summary of the agenda items for the Geneva meetings which are taking place physically from 9 to 12 October.
Over a four-day period this week, between 9 and 12 October, the Audit & Finance Committee (AFC), Ethics & Governance Committee (EGC) and Strategy Committee (SC) have been meeting to finalize the documents for November’s Board meeting. Here we outline the highlights of the three Committee agendas which will give you a flavour of what’s coming up in the November Board meetings. Our next GFO issue 439 will cover some of the issues discussed in more depth, including stakeholders’ feedback.
The SC was preceded by a Pre-call on 3 October, for discussion of Decision items of which there were four: one for SC recommendation to the Board and three for SC Decision:
The in-person SC meeting started on
. Following approval of the agenda and quorum and Declarations of Conflict of Interest, an overview of the meeting agenda was provided and was followed by a discussion on setting the meeting’s expectations. Thereafter the majority of the morning was spent discussing
based on two documents provided for information:
After lunch, the SC moved on to the
which will eventually be a key basis of the forthcoming Board discussion on how well the Global Fund has performed. Following this discussion on the paper, which at this stage was for information only, the Committee went on to discuss the first item For Decision,
. This was informed by a presentation on the Update on Evaluation Matters paper and two others, the Annual Evaluation workplan and budget, and the Evaluation Publication Procedure. The final discussion of the day was on
, For Recommendation to the Board.
On
, the day started with the second item For SC Decision, the
. After the break, the SC listened to a summary of what happened at the
Our previous GFO, 437, carried two articles on the UNGA 23 meetings, which you can read here and here. This was followed by an
for information only. But do please read our article in this GFO about the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report on Country Coordinating Mechanisms which will give you a very good idea of the key issues regarding the CCM Evolution Strategic Initiative and some of the main issues that would have been discussed.
The afternoon was largely taken up with thematic discussions, the first on
and the second on
The final session of the day finished with an update on
The final day, Wednesday 11 October, launched with a two-hour discussion on resilient and sustainable systems for health,
. This is an important agenda item because, as you will see from our various articles on the TRP observations reports, countries have struggled with RSSH in the first two Windows of the funding application cycle. After lunch the Committee went on to discuss
, before the SC meeting finished and an Executive Session took place.
This meeting was held over the two days 10 and 11 October, its first day being held concurrently with the SC meeting. The meeting was opened on Tuesday 10th with a welcome to Committee Members by the EGC Leadership, Declarations of Interest, an overview of the agenda and expected outcomes, and update on the EGC work plan and the Committee Self-Assessment Results from the previous EGC meeting. The Committee then launched into a discussion on the
based on two documents, the Governance Action Plan 2.0 - update on governance strengthening initiatives and a Governance Risk Matters update. The morning’s final session was on
After lunch, members discussed the preparations and lunch for the
and
which was For Input and included a presentation on the Culture of Trust, Collaboration and Accountability. The day finished with an Executive Session.
On
the EGC started with an Update on the
Process which led into a session on
The 2024 Ethics Budget and Work Plan was For Decision and an Ethics Function progress update was provided For Information, including Ethics Risk Matters. These debates were based on three background documents, Ethics Function 2023 Budget and Work Plan (including the Ethics Function Progress Update), the Semi-Annual Risk Management Report and the Agreed Management Actions Update. The
Annual Report and Update was then discussed before the break for lunch.
The afternoon sessions started with a discussion For Input on the
to incorporate Advisory Bodies, then
based on the annual report of the same name, followed by
This discussed the Privileges and Immunities Advisory Group Terms of Reference and an update on other legal matters. The final session of the day was an update on the informal, joint SC-EGC
. Day 2’s closing session comprised the EGC Self-Assessment, the meeting’s key take-aways and next steps/closing remarks.
The AFC met on 11 and 12 October in Geneva, having been preceded by a closed Executive Session on 18 September which discussed
There were two items for discussion to be presented at the AFC meeting itself For Decision: (i) the 2023 Interim Financial Report, including the 2023 Condensed Interim Financial Statements following the limited review by the external auditor; and (ii) the Expanded Audit Scope and additional fees for Input and an Update from the External Auditor, including a feasibility assessment. On 4 October there was a Pre-Call regarding
and a
The AFC meeting started on
and is being run in parallel to the SC meeting. It covered the following topics:
was first discussed For Input, based on a presentation on the Update on 2022 KPI results against targets (based on the 2017-2022 KPI Framework), and this was followed by a
The afternoon sessions started with a Closed Executive Session, which was followed by a session on
For Decision (approval during the 2024 OPEX Budget session) was the OIG’s 2024 Work Plan, KPIs and Budget; For Input there was an Update on OIG Operational Progress; and For Information an Update on Agreed Management Actions. The afternoon’s final session was about the
at which a Proposal of a new assurance approach for blended financing transactions was recommended.
Day 2,
, will start with
and a presentation for Information on Financial Performance Oversight on Sources and Uses of Funds, including COVID-19 Response Mechanism. This will be followed by the
covering, For Decision, the OIG’s 2024 Work Plan, KPIs and Budget and, For Recommendation, the 2024 OPEX Budget (including OIG Budget) and Corporate Workplan.
After lunch, the AFC will discuss
For Recommendation is the Amendment to the Risk Appetite Statements (Malaria program quality risk timeline) with input from the Strategy Committee meeting which finished the day previously, and For Input the Semi-Annual Risk Management Report, with inputs from SC and EGC on risks related to their respective mandates. The next session, on
, is For Input and covers an Update on Resource Mobilization, including lessons learned from the Seventh Replenishment. The Committee then moves on to discuss
and its closing session will recap the main Action Points from the AFC23 meeting, and the AFC workplan.
We would like to take this opportunity to raise our concerns yet again about how the Global Fund continues to be less transparent than it used to be. It is not just a case of some of the grant documents being removed from the website, as we have mentioned several times previously. In 2022, the Strategy Committee was given an extended decision-making mandate as outlined in the Charter of the Sttrategy Committee, which states that the Strategy Committee shall exercise the following decision-making powers (page 3):
This is followed on page 4 by an even longer list of oversight functions.
Given this huge and important mandate it is baffling to us that these workings of the Committees are shrouded in so much secrecy. The Charter states that the Strategy Committee is only accountable to the Board. Stakeholders are still not privy to its discussions that result in the decisions being taken, which are also not shared with the public unless they become Board-approved. The Global Fund is very good at urging countries to adhere to the principle of more transparency and accountability at country level through freedom of information and involving a wide range of stakeholders: but its own house still needs to be put in order.
We don’t ask for much. Just that these docuents be available to anyone who wants to see them. We can understand the embargo on documents for Board meeting discussion before the Board meeting but not afterwards; and certainly not when it relates to the Committees’ and other documents that lead to these decisions being taken.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!