
GFO Issue 295, Article Number: 9
N/A
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
An innovative new website gives communities and their representatives access to more information about the Global Fund in Russian. Meanwhile, the Eurasian Harm Reduction Network has released a video on the ladder of citizen participation.
An innovative project has been created to inform Russian-speaking communities and civil society organizations (CSOs) about the news, important decisions and policy documents related to the Global Fund, and about the programs financed by the Fund in Eastern Europe and Central Asia (EECA). The project takes the form of a website. The site also shares opportunities for training and funding, and educational resources related to HIV and TB.
The site was created as part of the regional program,
Regional Civil Society and Community Support, Coordination and Communication Platform – EECA
.
The project is being implemented by a consortium of technical assistance providers and regional networks led by two entities – the EECA technical assistance HUB and the Alliance-Ukraine Consultancy – affiliated with the Alliance for Public Health.
The program supports communities from different countries in the region to exchange information, and it strengthens coordination between different initiatives across the region. Through the website, CSOs also learn about various opportunities for technical assistance (TA) and how to apply for such assistance.
According to an assessment recently conducted by the regional program, the lack of capacity of communities is the significant challenge for implementing services related to community, rights, and gender (CRG). The assessment found that communities were not aware of different policies and tools distributed across the region. Concern was expressed about the lack of materials available in Russian. The website fills this gap by providing translated resources on a wide variety of topics.
The web-site is easy to navigate. It consists from the following sections: information about the regional program; news; educational resources; and information and advice concerning TA. The website also has a calendar of main events planned across the region. Further, the website allows users to subscribe to an email newsletter which provides a weekly digest of all news and updated resources placed on the web. Finally, the website is linked to a Facebook page, which is a popular social media vehicle in the EECA.

Kateryna Maksymenko
Building the capacities of communities is important, given that HIV and TB programs are being transitioned from Global Fund to domestic support in many countries – and given the need for communities to become more proactive in pushing for services of key affected populations; in protecting their rights; and in promoting the liberalization of restrictive drug policies.
Funding for this project will end in April 2017. The project coordinators are seeking ways to keep the website and newsletter going beyond that date. Kateryna Maksymenko, manager of the regional program told GFO that the website is the intellectual property of the Global Fund and that the Fund will probably continue financing it for as long as they are funding programs in the region.
Ladder of citizen participation
Meanwhile, the Eurasian Harm Reduction Network (EHRN), released a self-assessment tool for CSOs in the form of a video. The tool, called
The seven steps through the ladder of citizen participation
, helps community representatives know where they stand on the ladder at any particular moment.
The tool, which has been adapted from an instrument originally created in 1969 by Sherry Arnstein, defines three levels and seven steps of the civil society leader’s power in state decision-making (see table).
Table: The levels and steps in the ladder of citizen participation
Level
Steps
Key characteristics
NON-PARTICIPATION
1-Manipulation
CSO representation is invited, but CSO is not allowed
to participate in planning, allocation,implementation
and monitoring of processes.
At this stage, community is invited to all meetings with
the purpose to share own story,own story, officials
listen with empathy, maybe shake a hand and share
a share a visit card and the communication ends here.
and monitoring of processes.
At this stage, the community is invited to all meetings
with the purpose to share own story, officials listen
with empathy, story, officials listen with empathy,
maybe shake a hand and share a visit card and
the communication ends here.
2-Psychotherapy
TOKENISM
3-Informing
The government listens and takes into the account
the opinion of the community actively presenting
monitoring outcomes, suggesting changes, which
are accepted verbally, included into the minutes,
but the final result is still not there.
No actual change happens.
4-Consultation
5-Placation
CITIZEN POWER
(CONTROL)
6-Partnership
The level of the citizen power and citizen control
over the decisions of the government.
The leaders in working groups are from the
community, represent the community, are
supported by the community, and are accountable
for the work.
7-Delegated Power
The video is in Russian. It describes the information provided in the table in simple, understandable language by providing practical examples of real situations. The authors of the video told GFO that it will be translated in English, using either subtitles or dubbing.

Igor Gordon
The idea of developing the video tool came when a team delivering training to representatives of the community of people who inject drugs asked about meaningful participation in CCM processes. “Once we asked participants to assess the level of their engagement with the government, most found themselves either on the first or second level of communication and they were really shocked,” said Igor Gordon, Membership and Community Strengthening team leader for EHRN.
Gordon added, “Communities are often frustrated, they put so much efforts in advocacy, but still there are no tangible results achieved in policy changes across the region. This tool can give them clear answer, why and will give them right direction.”
For more information about the tool, including the English version of the video, please contact Igor Gordon at
igor.gordon@harm-reduction.org
.
Regional Civil Society and Community Support, Coordination and Communication Platform – EECA
. The project is being implemented by a consortium of technical assistance providers and regional networks led by two entities – the EECA technical assistance HUB and the Alliance-Ukraine Consultancy – affiliated with the Alliance for Public Health. The program supports communities from different countries in the region to exchange information, and it strengthens coordination between different initiatives across the region. Through the website, CSOs also learn about various opportunities for technical assistance (TA) and how to apply for such assistance. According to an assessment recently conducted by the regional program, the lack of capacity of communities is the significant challenge for implementing services related to community, rights, and gender (CRG). The assessment found that communities were not aware of different policies and tools distributed across the region. Concern was expressed about the lack of materials available in Russian. The website fills this gap by providing translated resources on a wide variety of topics. The web-site is easy to navigate. It consists from the following sections: information about the regional program; news; educational resources; and information and advice concerning TA. The website also has a calendar of main events planned across the region. Further, the website allows users to subscribe to an email newsletter which provides a weekly digest of all news and updated resources placed on the web. Finally, the website is linked to a Facebook page, which is a popular social media vehicle in the EECA.
![]() |
Kateryna Maksymenko |
Ladder of citizen participation
Meanwhile, the Eurasian Harm Reduction Network (EHRN), released a self-assessment tool for CSOs in the form of a video. The tool, called
The seven steps through the ladder of citizen participation
, helps community representatives know where they stand on the ladder at any particular moment. The tool, which has been adapted from an instrument originally created in 1969 by Sherry Arnstein, defines three levels and seven steps of the civil society leader’s power in state decision-making (see table).
Table: The levels and steps in the ladder of citizen participation
Level |
Steps |
Key characteristics |
NON-PARTICIPATION |
1-Manipulation |
CSO representation is invited, but CSO is not allowed to participate in planning, allocation,implementation and monitoring of processes. At this stage, community is invited to all meetings with the purpose to share own story,own story, officials listen with empathy, maybe shake a hand and share a share a visit card and the communication ends here. and monitoring of processes. At this stage, the community is invited to all meetings with the purpose to share own story, officials listen with empathy, story, officials listen with empathy, maybe shake a hand and share a visit card and the communication ends here. |
2-Psychotherapy |
||
TOKENISM |
3-Informing |
The government listens and takes into the account the opinion of the community actively presenting monitoring outcomes, suggesting changes, which are accepted verbally, included into the minutes, but the final result is still not there. No actual change happens. |
4-Consultation |
||
5-Placation |
||
CITIZEN POWER (CONTROL) |
6-Partnership |
The level of the citizen power and citizen control over the decisions of the government. The leaders in working groups are from the community, represent the community, are supported by the community, and are accountable for the work. |
7-Delegated Power |
![]() |
Igor Gordon |
igor.gordon@harm-reduction.org
.