The Global Fund is preparing to hold meetings of the three Committees ¾Strategy, Audit & Finance and Ethics & Governance. In this article we provide you with a flavour of the upcoming agenda topics and indicate which ones we will explore in more depth in the pre-Board issue of the Global Fund Observer.
It’s that time of year again! Global Fund Board members will assemble for the Board’s 48th meeting to be held between 15 and 17 November. So, between 10 and 14 October the Secretariat will host the 20th series of Committee meetings in preparation for that Board meeting, bringing Committee members together to discuss and recommend, as needed, decisions to be endorsed by the Board. The Strategy Committee (SC) will meet between 10 to 12 October and the Ethics & Governance Committee (EGC) on 10/11 October, followed by the Audit & Finance Committee (AFC) on 13/14 October.
The meetings were launched online on 4 October this week with Pre-Calls on two recommendation items: (i) a discussion on the
(including
(KPIs) and the
); and (ii)
: Non-Global Fund financed procurement through wambo.org. This was followed by a Pre-Call on two items to go to the Board for a decision: (i) the
; and (ii) the
(TRP). Both budgets will be included in Operating Expenses (OpEx) through the AFC.
At some stage there will have been a joint SC/AFC Pre-call: an
although at the time of writing it was not known when (if) this meeting had taken place. It is of particular interest given the apparent poor performance of the C19RM grants with low drawdowns and expenditure rates; but as usual, there is a story behind this and it is not as simple as it seems We’ll bring you an article on this specific topic in the next GFO.
Below is a snapshot of the meeting’s main topics to be discussed:
For recommendation: There are two items for recommendation, the aforementioned
and the
.
For decision: The two decision items are the two budgets for the new
and the
.
For input: There are several interesting items for discussion by SC members.
As the Global Fund’s current evaluation mechanism, the Technical Reference Evaluation Group (TERG) prepares to close its doors before the new structure is launched, the SC will discuss TERG matters: in particular, its two
, one on
and the other on
. Article 3 in this special pre-Committee issue of the GFO is an in-depth look into the COE evaluation recommendations and the Secretariat’s response (The Global Fund Challenging Operating Environment Policy could do much better: but is the Secretariat taking the easy way out ?).
Still on TERG, there will be an update on “continuing TERG workstreams” which presumably will be completed under the new evaluation structure: an
, one on
and, of especial note, the
. This should make for some interesting reading and we’ll try to provide more information on it once the report has been published.
As well as some time devoted to the aforementioned item requiring financial decision-making (annual budget and work plan for the Evaluation Structure), there will be discussion on the
, preparations for
and an
at the World Bank. We have already brought you two articles on the FIF in June (The Financial Intermediary Fund: A New Model That Duplicates the Global Fund) and in our last issue in September, GFO 419, Who Is the New Kid on the Block in the Global Health Ecology? So we await this update, which is probably a report on the Board meeting held early in September, with interest.
For information: In addition to the aforementioned topics, the SC will review the Update on allocations and operationalization of
, the
,
(current cycle) and the
non grant financed pilot. Our next pre-Board issue of the GFO will bring you more in-depth articles on Catalytic Investments, and Country Funding, Portfolio Optimization and Strategic Initiatives.
A Pre-Call Executive Session meeting will be held jointly with the
However, before that on 1, 2 and 27 September, Optional Virtual Onboarding sessions were held on:
and
:
,
, and
; and the
.
The AFC agenda is a tightly packed one.
For recommendation: Members will consider: (i) the
(including the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) budget)/Strategy costing with three-year cap and corporate work plan); (ii) the
; and (iii) the
. We hope to bring you a separate article on item (ii) in our next pre-Board GFO.
For decision: Members will have to reach a conclusion on: (i) the
; (ii) the
; (iii)
; (iv) the
; and (v) the establishment of the interestingly named
. Our pre-Board meeting GFO will carry an article on portfolio optimization and also on catalytic investments.
For input: Members will provide their thoughts on the
, with inputs by the SC/EGC on risks related to their respective mandates for the holistic Global Fund risk profile. The Secretariat will provide an
and there will be discussions on the
and on
matters –
.
For information: There is a lot of background reading for AFC members covering a multitude of topics; an update on the
based on the SC’s recommendation to the Board from earlier in the week; a general update on
; updates on
and
(AMAs); the
and an
, the
(Written Input) and, finally, the
.
On 13 September EFC members were briefed on the
and other relevant matters ahead of the EGC 20th Meeting.
For recommendation: The RFC will make a recommendation to the Board concerning the
.
For decision: The Committee will have to take a decision on (i) the
(in an Executive session) and (ii) the
.
For input: The AFC will consider the
, the
, the
and an update on
.
For information: Other issues to be discussed include: an
; the
; a
; the
; lessons learned from recruiting the
; and an
.
Once again we end this article on the Committees’ agendas by asking why there is such mystery surrounding the Committees’ meetings, why the related documents cannot be published on the Global Fund website for all to see, and why observers to the meetings’ proceedings are so few. We ask - but we never receive a reply!
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!