
GFO Issue 188, Article Number: 6
PROGRAMME-RELATED FINDINGS IN THE OIG AUDIT REPORT ON AN HIV GRANT IN UZBEKISTAN
Sub-title :
News
Author: ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Our coverage of audit reports issued by the Office of the Inspector General usually focuses on the financial, management and procurement systems of principal recipients and sub-recipients. In this article, we report on the OIG’s findings concerning the programmatic aspects of an HIV grant in Uzbekistan.
Editor’s Note: In its audit reports, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) comments on the performance of the programmes being implemented through Global Fund grants as well as on the systems in place for programme management, financial management and procurement. In the past, coverage of the OIG audit reports in GFO has focussed primarily on the systems. In this article, we report on the OIG’s findings with respect to the HIV programmes covered by the Global Fund’s grant in Uzbekistan.
At the end of April 2012, the Global Fund's Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released the final report of an audit on three grants in Uzbekistan, administered by three principal recipients (PRs), including the Republican AIDS Center (RAC), PR for the Round 3 HIV grant. The RAC is part of the Ministry of Health (MOH).
The audit was conducted between 17 August and 17 September 2009, and a further financial audit was conducted in the first quarter of 2010. The value of the HIV grant was $21 million, of which $15 million (71%) had been disbursed at the time of the audit.
In this article, we report on some of the OIG’s findings with respect to the HIV programmes covered by the grant. In its comments, the OIG dealt with both the national HIV programme and the grant from the Global Fund.
The OIG said that, overall, the RAC had successfully carried out work plans of the Round 3 grant, but that some planned activities have not been implemented. The OIG cited several examples:
- the substitution treatment component of the programme was terminated;
- a reproductive health curriculum for schools was not developed;
- teachers were not trained in reproductive health issues;
- palliative care was not provided to PLWHA; and
- protocols for palliative care were not developed.
- pre-test counselling is not routinely done at all service delivery points;
- most infectious disease doctors, who are supposed to provide clinical oversight to patients on ARVs, have not had adequate in-service training; and
- there is poor coordination between HIV and TB programmes.
Publication Date:
2012-06-19