Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter
THE GLOBAL FUND SCORES WELL IN THE 2016 AID TRANSPARENCY INDEX
GFO Issue 285

THE GLOBAL FUND SCORES WELL IN THE 2016 AID TRANSPARENCY INDEX

Author:

David Garmaise

Article Type:
News

Article Number: 3

ABSTRACT The non-profit organization, Publish What You Fund (PWYF), has ranked The Global Fund among the top five donors of global aid for its transparency and accountability. The organization released its Aid Transparency Index on 13 April.

According to the non-profit organization, Publish What You Fund (PWYF), The Global Fund ranks among the top five donors of global aid for its transparency and accountability. PWYF released its Aid Transparency Index on 13 April.

The index assessed 10 donors as being “very good,” which is the top category. The other categories were “good,” “fair,” “poor,” and “very poor.” The other donors in the “very good” category included the United Nations Development Programme, which topped the index for the second times with a score of 93.3%, the (U.S.) Millennium Challenge Corporation, Unicef, the (U.K.) Department for International Development, the World Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank, the Asian Development Bank, Sweden and the African Development Bank. PWYF said that all of the donors in the “very good” category “should be commended for their efforts in dramatically improving the timeliness and the comprehensiveness of their aid information since 2011” (when donors formally committed to make their aid transparent by 2015, and when PWYF released its first index).

For the most part, the index assesses information on the implementation of individual grants at country level. The methodology for producing the index has evolved over time. Since 2013, PWYF has been putting more emphasis on the quality of the information. PWYF fund said that despite a steady improvement in transparency since 2011, “the quality of most donors’ data is still not good enough for it to be used by other stakeholders.”

The 2016 index also showed that the Global Fund ranked first in three activity level indicators – performance, related documents, and basic information. Performance refers primarily to results. Related documents refers to memoranda of understanding, evaluations, objectives, budget documents, contracts, and tenders. Basic information covers items like implementer name and contact details.

In a statement issued by the Fund, Executive Director Mark Dybul said that “transparency is essential for any organization that invests public money for the public good. “It is in the bedrock of our founding principles, and absolutely crucial to our effectiveness.”

Editor’s note: GFO has published two commentaries recently concerning what it perceives to be gaps in transparency at The Global Fund. The commentaries focused not on grant implementation, but rather on the application and review processes, and on the appraisal of country coordinating mechanisms. The commentaries are available here and here

Leave a reply

  • Anonymous comments (0)
  • Facebook Comments

Your email address will not be published.

Aidspan

Categories*

Loading
Aidspan

Categories*

Loading