Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter
Key Decisions Made by Global Fund Board
GFO Issue 27

Key Decisions Made by Global Fund Board

Author:

Bernard Rivers

Article Type:
News

Article Number: 2

ABSTRACT The board rejected proposed requirements regarding CCM structure and methods. The "Communities" board delegation was granted the vote. The board rejected proposals to accept certain forms of in-kind donations. And more.

Key decisions made by the Global Fund board at the meeting that ended today were as follows.

  • The board discussed a series of proposed “requirements” and “recommendations” regarding CCM composition and working methods. However, in the course of an animated debate, the board decided to change all of the “requirements” to “recommendations”.
  • As reported elsewhere in this issue of GFO, the board approved all Round 4 grants that the TRP recommended.
  • The “Communities” board delegation, which represents people living with the three diseases, was granted the vote. (Previously, that delegation participated in all board discussions but did not have a vote.)
  • After lengthy discussion, the board failed to agree on any procedures whereby the Fund will accept in-kind donations. (It appears unlikely that this idea will be raised again for some time. However, as in the past, there is nothing to prevent grant recipients from negotiating in-kind donations on a bilateral basis with specific corporate donors, so long as the products received comply with the Fund’s procurement guidelines.)
  • The board asked the Secretariat to begin preparations for Round 5. (However, there was no discussion about when Round 5 will be launched; nor was there any discussion of the fact that it could be some years before there will be enough money for Round 5.)
  • The board agreed that in future rounds, applications from Lower Middle Income and Upper Middle Income countries must show that specified percentages of the cost of the projects for which Global Fund support is being requested will be covered by the country out of domestic resources.
  • The board agreed on procedures that will be followed in the event that there is not enough money to pay for grant renewals.
  • The board agreed that for Round 3 and later, if a proposal is agreed by the board but a grant agreement is not signed within a specified period of time, the proposal in effect becomes “un-approved.”
  • The board agreed to set up a new committee to review issues related to technical assistance.

Leave a reply

  • Anonymous comments (0)
  • Facebook Comments

Your email address will not be published.

Aidspan

Categories*

Loading
Aidspan

Categories*

Loading