Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter
REGIONAL CONCEPT NOTES: UPDATE ON TRP APPROVALS, REJECTIONS, AND ITERATIONS
GFO Issue 290

REGIONAL CONCEPT NOTES: UPDATE ON TRP APPROVALS, REJECTIONS, AND ITERATIONS

Author:

Charlie Baran

Article Type:
News

Article Number: 9

We correct an error in an article on this topic in GFO 289

ABSTRACT This article provides an update on the status of the 15 regional concept notes submitted in Wave 2. We acknowledge an error in an article on this topic in GFO 289.

The last issue of GFO included an article on the 15 regional applications that were submitted in the second wave. The main focus of the article was on the application and review processes. However, the article also included a table with details on each of the applications, and we reported, in error, that all 15 applications had been approved by the Technical Review Panel (TRP) for grant-making.

In April, the Secretariat informed individual applicants of their status, but did not make any public announcement. We have now clarified the status of each of the applications by contacting the applicants directly and through other sources. The status is as follows:

Eleven of the 15 applications were approved by the TRP for grant-making, without requiring substantial rewriting. They were as follows:

Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Alliance Nationale Contre le Sida (ANCS)
  • Handicap International (HI)
  • Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD)
  • International Treatment Preparedness Coalition – West Africa (ITPC-WA)

Asia

  • Australian Federation of AIDS Organizations (AFAO)
  • India HIV/AIDS Alliance

Middle East and North Africa

  • MENA Harm Reduction Association (MENAHRA) + Regional Arab Network Against AIDS (RANAA)

Latin American and the Caribbean

  • Caribbean Vulnerable Communities Coalition (CVC) + El Centro de Orientacion e Investigacion Integral (COIN)
  • Organismo Andino de Salud-Convenio Hipolito Unanue (ORAS-CONHU)
  • Pan-Caribbean Partnership Against HIV/AIDS (PANCAP)

Eastern Europe and Central Asia

  • Eurasian Coalition on Male Health (ECOM)

Two applications were tentatively approved by TRP for grant-making, pending substantial revising of the original concept note. They are currently in iteration. They were as follows:

Sub-Saharan Africa

  • MOSASWA Cross-Border Initiative

Eastern Europe and Central Asia

  • Alliance for Public Health (APH)

Two applications were not approved by TRP for grant-making. They were: Youth Leadership, Education, Advocacy and Development (Youth LEAD) in Asia; and Regional Coordinating Mechanism Mesoamerica in Latin America and the Caribbean.

For further details on each application, including participating countries, disease focus, and program descriptions, please refer to the GFO article in Issue 289.

Leave a reply

  • Anonymous comments (0)
  • Facebook Comments

Your email address will not be published.

Aidspan

Categories*

Loading
Aidspan

Categories*

Loading