Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter
Request for Phase 2 Funding for Two Malaria Grants in Republic of Congo Is Declined
GFO Issue 221

Request for Phase 2 Funding for Two Malaria Grants in Republic of Congo Is Declined

Author:

David Garmaise

Article Type:
News

Article Number: 5

ABSTRACT The Global Fund Board will not approve funding for Phase 2 of two Round 8 malaria grants to the Republic of Congo. In February, the country had been given notice by the Global Fund Secretariat of intent to recommend a No-Go for this grant.

The Global Fund Board will not approve funding for Phase 2 of two Round 8 malaria grants to the Republic of Congo.

The Board’s No-Go decision follows notice of an intent to recommend a No-Go for this grant provided by the Global Fund Secretariat in February 2013 (see GFO article). At the time, the Secretariat provided the following reasons for its No-Go intention:

  • inadequate programmatic and financial grant performance (a C rating, and an average expenditure rate of 48% for both grants);
  • failure to complete a mass distribution of long-lasting insecticide-treated bednets (LLINs), which started in April 2012; and
  • failure to complete key activities, such as routine LLIN distribution and the roll-out of rapid diagnostic tests.

In addition, the Secretariat said, data verification exercises revealed that reported data for the number of LLINS distributed to the general population and the percentage of pregnant women who received two or more doses of intermittent preventive therapy were unreliable. Finally, the Secretariat noted, the quality of services provided was poor due to the fact that the guidelines and protocols for malaria diagnosis and treatment were unclear.

The CCM responded to the Secretariat’s concerns on 16 April. Meanwhile, an audit report released by the Office of the Inspector General confirmed that there were major issues regarding the malaria programmes in the Republic of Congo.

The GAC said that although the CCM’s response described a number of actions undertaken and yet to be undertaken by the CCM, the GAC concluded that insufficient guarantees have been provided by the CCM to fully address the concerns raised.

The GAC said that it does not believe that this No-Go decision will imperil access to essential treatments because of a commitment by the Government of the Republic of Congo to spend € 16 million for the continuation of essential services during what would have been the Phase 2 period of the grant.

The GAC said that, in the view of the Secretariat’s country team for the Republic of Congo, the country should use the second half of 2013 to set the foundation for concrete change in the “implementation environment” for malaria programmes. The country team said that this should include (a) the finalisation of the National Malaria Strategic Plan for 2013–2017; (b) the restructuring of the National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP); and (c) transitioning to the revised World Health Organization malaria case management guidelines.

The GAC said that as soon as the National Malaria Strategic Plan is finalised, the CCM and its partners will be supported to initiate a country dialogue and to engage in the preparation of a concept note (for submission early in the full rollout of the new funding model) to cover a potential funding gap for the 2015 LLIN campaign.

The GAC recommended that the country team continue working closely with the Republic of Congo and its NMCP during this period of reprogramming, including exploring different ways of meeting interim needs that may emerge. The GAC said that it was prepared to consider requests for support for some of these interim needs.

Information for this article was taken from Board Decision B28-EDP-28 and from Board Document GF-B28-ER18, the Report of the Secretariat Funding Recommendations for June 2013. The latter document is not available on the Global Fund website. The text of the Board decision will be included in an electronic decisions document to be released after the Board meeting in Sri Lanka (18–19 June).

Leave a reply

  • Anonymous comments (0)
  • Facebook Comments

Your email address will not be published.

Aidspan

Categories*

Loading
Aidspan

Categories*

Loading