Rwanda

1.

Le modèle révolutionnaire de financement de la stratégie nationale du Rwanda a amélioré les résultats des subventions du Fonds mondial, affirme un rapport externe

12 Nov 2018
Une évaluation indépendante révèle une amélioration de la flexibilité, de l’appropriation par le pays et de la réalisation des cibles

En 2014, le Fonds mondial et le gouvernement du Rwanda ont conclu un accord en vue de mettre à l’essai un modèle de financement en fonction des résultats pour les trois subventions du Fonds mondial dans le pays (Voir OFM en direct, 11 février 2014), une première pour le Fonds mondial.

2.

Rwanda’s pioneering National Strategy Financing model improved Global Fund grant performance, says external report

6 Nov 2018
Independent evaluation shows improved flexibility, country ownership, and target achievement

In 2014 the Global Fund and Government of Rwanda entered into an agreement to pilot a result-based financing model for the Fund’s three grants in the country (See GFO Live, 11 February 2014), a first for the Fund.

3.

Le Kenya achète avec succès ses produits de santé sans passer par le mécanisme d’achat groupé du Fonds mondial

9 Sep 2018
L’autorité de fournitures médicales obtient des prix concurrentiels souvent inférieurs aux moyennes internationales

L’Agence de fournitures médicales du Kenya (KEMSA) achète et distribue avec succès des produits financés par les pouvoirs publics, le Fonds mondial et d’autres donateurs.

5.

Kenya successfully procures health commodities without using Global Fund’s pooled procurement

5 Sep 2018
Medical supplies authority obtains competitive prices that are often lower than international averages

The Kenya Medical Supplies Authority (KEMSA) successfully procures and distributes government, Global Fund, and other donor-funded commodities. Prices obtained by KEMSA are competitive compared to prices obtained by the Global Fund’s Pooled Procurement Mechanism (PPM), stock-outs of health commodities occur rarely, if ever, commodities are delivered in a timely fashion, and inventory is properly managed at all stages of the supply chain.

5.

Selon les résultats d’une étude d’Aidspan, les pays pourraient améliorer l’utilisation des données pour assurer une mise en œuvre plus efficace des subventions

11 Jul 2018
Différences constatées entre l’utilisation des données par les maîtres d’œuvre étatiques et non étatiques
4.

L’organisation africaine des institutions supérieures de contrôle des finances publiques et le BIG collaborent en vue d’améliorer les résultats et le suivi stratégique des subventions

11 Jul 2018
Le BIG a testé un nouveau modèle de collaboration en matière d’audit des subventions
7.

African organization of ‘supreme audit institutions’ and OIG collaborate to improve grant performance and oversight

2 Jul 2018
OIG has piloted new model of collaboration to audit grants

The African Organization of English-speaking Supreme Audit Institutions (AFROSAI-E) and the Global Fund’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) signed a memorandum of understanding in February 2017 to improve the oversight over Global Fund grants implemented by state Principal Recipients (PRs), and to strengthen relationships between the OIG and the supreme audit institutions (SAIs).

8.

Countries could improve data use to inform more effective grant implementation, Aidspan study finds

2 Jul 2018
Difference found between state and non-state implementers’ use of data

A new report published by Aidspan suggests that countries may not be using data optimally to inform grant implementation. Implementers of Global Fund grants collect and use data for several different purposes, depending on the type of implementer. State Principal Recipients collect data to measure strategic impact, whereas non-state implementers appear to collect data mainly to meet reporting requirements. 

3.

OIG says national strategy financing model pilot in Ethiopia should not proceed at this time

25 Feb 2015
Secretariat agrees that more work is needed

Neither the Global Fund Secretariat nor Ethiopia have the necessary systems in place to allow for a national financing strategy model to be implemented at this time. This is the conclusion of a pre-implementation review commissioned by the Secretariat and conducted by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG). The review was conducted between September and November 2014. A report on the review was released on 25 February 2015.

2.

Ecuador and Rwanda audits show mixed results

15 Jan 2015
Problems in governance, oversight and management in Rwanda; deficiencies in program performance and controls of health services and products in Ecuador

Reports on audits of grants in Rwanda and Ecuador were released by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) at the end of December.

Rwanda

Pages

Subscribe to Rwanda